SAP C_TS452 試験概要:
| 認定ベンダー: | SAP |
|---|---|
| 試験名: | SAP認定資格 - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition 調達・購買 |
| 試験番号: | C_TS452 |
| 試験形式: | システムベース評価, 参照資料持ち込み可, 実稼働SAP環境での実務課題 |
| 関連資格: | SAP認定アプリケーションアソシエイト - SAP S/4HANA 調達・購買 |
| 出題数: | システム上での課題形式（設問数は固定されていません） |
| 認定の有効期間: | 12か月 |
| 試験時間: | 180 分 |
| 合格点: | 76% |
| 受験料: | USD 578 |
| 対応言語: | 英語 |
| 推奨トレーニング: | TS450 - SAP S/4HANAにおける調達・購買 基礎編 TS452 - SAP S/4HANAにおける調達・購買 応用編 |
| 受験申し込み: | SAP Learning Hub 認定資格申込みサイト Pearson VUE |
| サンプル問題: | SAP C_TS452 サンプル問題 |
| 受験方法: | オンライン監督付き受験またはPearson VUE試験会場での受験。実稼働SAP S/4HANA環境にて実施 |
| 前提条件: | TS450およびTS452トレーニングコースの受講修了を推奨。SAP S/4HANAの調達業務に関する実務経験 |
| 公式シラバスのURL: | https://learning.sap.com/certification/c_ts452_2601 |
SAP C_TS452 試験シラバストピック:
| セクション | 比重 | 目標 |
|---|---|---|
| トピック 1: 消費量計画と調達元決定 | 10% - 15% | - 調達元リストと割当計画の定義 - 資材所要量計画（MRP）方式とロットサイズの設定 - 仕入先評価機能の設定 |
| トピック 2: 調達プロセス | 20% - 25% | - 柔軟な業務フローとリリース戦略の設定 - 調達から支払いまでの一連の業務フローの実行 - 購買依頼、発注書、契約の管理 |
| トピック 3: 企業構造とマスタデータ | 15% - 20% | - 企業構造の定義と設定 - ビジネスパートナー、品目マスタ、購買情報レコードの管理 - 勘定決定と評価の設定 |
| トピック 4: ロジスティクス請求書照合 | 15% - 20% | - 財務会計モジュールとの連携 - 請求書の処理と差異への対応 - 自動請求書保留・解除機能の設定 |
| トピック 5: 在庫管理 | 15% - 20% | - 特殊調達タイプの管理：外注加工、委託販売、パイプライン調達 - 入出庫処理と在庫移動の実施 - 実地棚卸手続きの実施 |
SAP Certified - SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sourcing and Procurement 認定 C_TS452 試験問題：
問題 #1
<strong>CHALLENGE 1 — Spend Classification Readiness for Depot Procurement Execution</strong> During first-close validation, two depots process comparable pump-maintenance demand under the shared procurement template. Both create the required purchasing documents successfully, but one depot later requires local interpretation to keep downstream handling aligned with expected treatment. The close office wants a result that remains consistent across depots.
What is the best first validation action?
A. Reduce release involvement for maintenance demand so document progression becomes faster at both depots
B. Move all pump-maintenance purchasing to one depot temporarily so first-close validation becomes easier to manage
C. Compare how spend-classification preparation was applied for the representative scenarios before changing downstream handling
D. Allow the affected depot to continue using local interpretation until the first close is completed
問題 #2
A sourcing and procurement program is running final governed regression in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after a controlled transport delivered approval-related configuration and refreshed validation content to pre-production. Manual requisitioning, purchase-order creation, and invoice verification still work in SAP Fiori. However, one automated approval package now fails at startup because the environment log shows that the required release content is active, but the package still references an outdated organizational execution set for one business scope.
A similar package for another scope runs successfully in the same tenant. The release manager wants a targeted fix before sign-off. No broad fallback role assignment may be granted, and no test-only exception is allowed because the production-aligned lifecycle model must remain controlled and audit-ready.
What should the consultant do first?
A. Restore the earlier broader regression setup so the failed package can run before the sign-off deadline.
B. Mark the failed package as acceptable because another approval package still works in the same environment.
C. Rebuild the approval rules because startup failures usually indicate incomplete release-process design.
D. Compare the transported business-scope assignment and organizational execution-set binding used by the affected approval package in pre-production.
問題 #3
A sourcing and procurement program is running final governed regression in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition after a controlled transport delivered approval-related configuration and refreshed validation content to pre-production. Manual requisitioning, purchase-order creation, and invoice verification still work in SAP Fiori. However, one automated approval package now fails at startup because the environment log shows that the required release configuration is active, but the package is still pointing to an outdated organizational-scope variant for one business area.
A comparable package for another business area runs successfully in the same tenant. The release manager wants a targeted correction before sign-off. No broad fallback access may be granted, and no test-only exception is allowed because the production-aligned lifecycle model must remain controlled and audit-ready.
Which action should the consultant take first?
A. Restore the earlier broader regression setup so the failed package can run before the sign-off deadline.
B. Mark the failed package as acceptable because another approval package still works in the same environment.
C. Rebuild the approval rules because startup failures usually indicate incomplete release-process design.
D. Compare the transported business-area scope assignment and organizational-scope variant referenced by the affected approval package in pre-production.
問題 #4
<strong>CHALLENGE 2 — Planning and Source Setup for Repetitive Material Demand</strong> For frequently consumed maintenance materials, buyers report that one plant can process recurring demand smoothly while another plant must intervene repeatedly before purchasing documents follow the expected replenishment path. The project team wants to confirm whether the template supports scalable behavior for high-volume items. What should be validated first?
A. Whether all repetitive-demand materials should be converted to free-text requisitioning during rollout
B. Whether buyers at the slower plant have enough training to remember the manual workaround steps
C. Whether planning-relevant and procurement-relevant master data were prepared with the same assumptions for the affected materials
D. Whether invoice verification tolerances should be loosened for repetitive-demand materials
問題 #5
A manufacturing company is validating centrally governed source-list and contract usage in SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition for a new regional rollout. Buyers can create contracts, and the contracts are released successfully in SAP Fiori. Purchase requisitions for the affected materials are also created and approved without issue. However, when regional buyers convert those requisitions into purchase orders, the system proposes a valid supplier but does not prioritize the released contract source for one region.
In another region using the same material category, the contract is proposed correctly. The sourcing lead wants the team to preserve the governed sourcing model and avoid local buyer overrides. The correction must remain standard, transportable, and suitable for future rollout regions under the same clean-core rules.
What is the best first action?
A. Delay regional contract sourcing and use open supplier selection temporarily so purchasing execution remains fast.
B. Ask buyers in the affected region to reference the contract manually until all rollout regions are live.
C. Check whether the regional source-priority and contract-relevant assignments are correctly maintained for the affected organizational scope and materials.
D. Rebuild requisition approval because approved requisitions should automatically force contract use during PO creation.
解説：
| 問題 #1 正解： C | 問題 #2 正解： D | 問題 #3 正解： D | 問題 #4 正解： C | 問題 #5 正解： C |
1047 お客様のコメント
品質保証JPexamはIT認定試験のシラバスに従って、試験問題の範囲を正確に絞って、的中率が99％の最新問題集を捧げます。
1年間の無料更新サービスJPexamは1年以内に問題集の無料更新サービスを提供し、お客様がいつでも最新版の問題集を持つことを保証いたします。もし試験の内容が変更されたら、弊社は直ちにお客様にお知らせします。それに、弊社の問題集が更新されたら、早速メールで最新バージョンを送付いたします。
全額返金JPexamの問題集を利用すると、短時間で勉強しても試験に合格できるのを保証いたします。試験に不合格になってしまった場合、弊社は全額返金いたします。(
ご購入前のお試しJPexamは問題集のサンプルを無料で提供いたします。ご購入前にサンプルを試用して製品の品質を確認することができます。ご遠慮なく利用してください。
