SAP C_TS462_2601 試験概要:

SAP C_TS462_2601 試験シラバストピック:

SAP Certified - Implementation Consultant for SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition, Sales 認定 C_TS462_2601 試験問題：

問題 #1
A regional industrial-fluid supplier is preparing SAP S/4HANA Sales for a mixed SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition and retained on-premise rollout. A converted contract customer is active as a business partner and can be selected as the sold-to party. Orders save correctly in the established sales area, but in a newly activated sales area the expected ship-to partner and shipping-condition proposal are not derived during order entry. The visible artifact is an active customer relationship with proposal data complete in one sales context and incomplete in another.
The project team must preserve one shared customer identity because the customer will transact through both retained and new sales operations. The constraint is to restore standard proposal behavior without creating a duplicate customer or changing the sales order type.
What should the consultant validate first to correct the missing proposal values?
Response:

A. dd an order-entry instruction so users manually enter the ship-to partner and shipping condition whenever the new sales area is selected.
B. reate a separate customer record for the new sales area so ship-to and shipping-condition values can be maintained independently.
C. alidate the business partner customer role and sales-area-specific partner and shipping data so the required proposal values are available during order processing.
D. hange the sales document type so ship-to and shipping-condition proposals are no longer required during order creation.

問題 #2
A regional industrial filtration supplier is validating SAP S/4HANA Sales during a mixed SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition and retained on-premise rollout. A newly introduced rush-order escalation flow can be created and saved, and the order appears in document flow. However, the follow-on execution monitor shows that only the escalated items remain at an earlier processing state while non-escalated items in the same order move forward normally. The visible artifact is an item-level status inconsistency after execution validation, not a failed order save.
Sales operations wants the rush flow released without adding user-driven status correction. The constraint is to preserve the standard order process while correcting the configuration behavior that controls item-level follow-on progression.
Which validation step best addresses the escalated item status inconsistency?
Response:

A. alidate the rush-order process configuration and item-level follow-on control so escalated items are assigned the intended execution behavior.
B. dd a billing block so commercial processing waits until users manually review the escalated item status.
C. hange the customer sales area data so customers using rush orders receive a separate processing default during order entry.
D. dd a manual completion step so users can close escalated items after the order appears in document flow.

問題 #3
A commercial security systems reseller is validating SAP S/4HANA Sales billing during a phased private-cloud rollout. A new maintenance-credit flow creates the sales order and billing document successfully, but the billing calculation does not reflect the intended credit condition. The visible artifact is a completed billing document where the commercial value follows the base item calculation only.
Finance wants the process released only if the billing result is repeatable without manual value correction. The constraint is to preserve standard billing creation while ensuring the maintenance-credit condition is retrieved during billing calculation in the transition landscape.
Which validation step best addresses the missing maintenance-credit condition?
Response:

A. dd a manual billing correction step so finance users can enter the maintenance-credit value after billing is created.
B. alidate the pricing configuration and condition determination inputs for the maintenance-credit flow so the expected condition is retrieved before billing calculation.
C. hange the delivery completion rule so billing waits until logistics confirms that all items are fully processed.
D. reate a separate customer record for maintenance-credit customers so commercial values are isolated from standard sales processing.

問題 #4
A regional industrial-tool rental provider is validating SAP S/4HANA Sales delivery processing during an incremental move to SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition. Sales orders for returnable transport cases save, confirm, and show valid availability. Delivery creation fails only when the items use a newly configured branch-transfer delivery path used during coexistence with the retained on-premise operation. The visible artifact is a delivery rejection after successful order confirmation, while customer selection and item entry remain valid.
The logistics lead wants the standard sales order process preserved because the same cases deliver through the regular outbound path. The constraint is to correct the delivery-processing dependency for branch transfer without changing customer master data or the sales document type.
Which validation step best addresses the branch-transfer delivery rejection?
Response:

A. hange customer payment terms so commercial checks complete before delivery processing starts.
B. hange the requested delivery date so the system retries delivery creation with a later schedule line.
C. dd a billing block for branch-transfer items so finance cannot invoice before logistics manually reviews eligibility.
D. alidate the delivery-processing configuration and logistics-relevant assignment for the branch-transfer path so the confirmed item can pass delivery creation checks.

問題 #5
A regional industrial safety supplier is validating SAP S/4HANA Sales during a mixed SAP S/4HANA Cloud Private Edition and retained on-premise rollout. A newly introduced replacement-after-inspection order flow allows the sales order to save and creates document flow, but selected items do not move into the expected follow-on execution state. The visible artifact is that header processing appears complete, while item status remains inconsistent only for the inspection-based replacement flow.
The sales operations lead wants the process released without adding manual item closure after order entry. The constraint is to preserve the standard order-to-follow-on execution path and correct only the configuration behavior that prevents the affected items from reaching the intended processing state.
Which validation step best addresses the item execution status inconsistency?
Response:

A. alidate the sales process configuration and item-level follow-on control so inspection-based replacement items are bound to the intended execution behavior.
B. dd a manual completion instruction so users can close inspection-based replacement items after document flow is created.
C. hange the customer sales area data so inspection-based customers receive a separate processing default during order entry.
D. djust the billing block so commercial processing is delayed until users review the open item status.

解説：